基于TRIZ的二级类比概念设计研究

• 论文 •

基于TRIZ的二级类比概念设计研究

檀润华，张瑞红，刘芳，杨伯军

河北工业大学创新设计研究所,天津 300130

收稿日期:2005-01-20 修回日期:2005-04-18 出版日期:2006-03-15 发布日期:2006-03-25
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(50375045)；天津市自然科学基金重点资助项目（043802211）;河北省科技攻关项目(03213565D)。

Two stages analogy-based conceptual design based on TRIZ

TAN Run-hua, ZHANG Rui-hong, LIU Fang, YANG Bo-jun

Inst. of Design for Innovation, Hebei Univ. of Tech., Tianjin 300130, China

Received:2005-01-20 Revised:2005-04-18 Online:2006-03-15 Published:2006-03-25
Supported by:
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation, China(No. 50375045),the Tianjin Natural Science Foundation, China(No.043802211)and the Hebei Municipal Science and Technology Council, China(No.93213565D).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 创新问题解决理论求解领域问题所得到的解及相应的设计实例作为类比设计的源设计，将创新问题解决理论过程转变为第一级类比过程，提出了其过程模型。将上述过程的结果作为情景，按基于情景的类比设计原理，提出了第二级类比过程模型。两级类比过程模型集成形成了基于创新问题解决理论的二级类比概念设计过程模型。该模型分为9步，不仅应用了创新问题解决理论标准化的问题求解过程及已积累的知识库，也能发挥设计人员的创新能力。上述模型已应用于国产圆网造纸机烘干部件的概念创新设计实例中，证明了该模型的有效性。

关键词: 创新问题解决理论, 类比设计, 概念设计, 过程模型

Abstract: There is a standard process to solve a domain problem using the theory of inventive problem solving (TRIZ). TRIZ solutions, such as principles and cases to solve conflicts, are integrated from long history. The TRIZ solutions and cases were used as source designs and the standard process was modified to an analogy process which was named the first analogy process. The second analogy process was formed in which the specific TRIZ solutions for domain problems from the first analogy process were used as an input situation. By means of integrating the first and the second process, a new process model for analogy-based design process was formed, which was a process model for two stage analogy-based conceptual design. There are 9 steps for this model, where the standard TRIZ solution was given and the accumulated knowledge base was applied, as well as the innovation capability of designers was exerted. A design process for a component of a paper machine has been carried out using the proposed model and showed effectiveness of the model.

Key words: TRIZ, analogy-based design, conceptual design, process model

中图分类号:

TH122

檀润华，张瑞红，刘芳，杨伯军. 基于TRIZ的二级类比概念设计研究[J]. .

TAN Run-hua, ZHANG Rui-hong, LIU Fang, YANG Bo-jun. Two stages analogy-based conceptual design based on TRIZ[J]. .

参考文献

［1］ DUBITZKY W. Knowledge integration in case-based reasoning: a concept-centered approach［D］.Ulster,NY,USA:University of Ulster,1997.

[2] GOEL A K. Design, analogy, and creativity［J］. IEEE Expert, 1997,12(3):62-70.

[3] ALTSHULLER G. The innovation algorithm, TRIZ, systematic innovation and technical creativity. technical［M］.Worcester,NY,USA:Worcester Innovation Center,1999.

[4] DUNBAR K, BAKER L M. Goals, analogy, and the social constraints of scientific discovery［J］. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1994, 17(4):538-539.

[5] SCHUNN C D, DUNBAR K. Priming, analogy, and awareness in complex reasoning［J］. Memory & Cognition, 1996, 24(3): 271-284..

[6] BONNARDEL N. Towards understanding and supporting creativity in design: analogies in a constrained cognitive environment［J］. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2000,13(7-8):505-513.

[7] KODRATOFF Y. Introduction to Machine Learning［M］. London,U.K.: Pitman, 1988.

[8] SAVRANSKY S D. Engineering of creativity［M］. New York,NY,USA:CSC Press, 2000.

[9] TAN Runhua.Theory of inventive problem solving［M］. Beijing: Science Press, 2004(in Chinese).［檀润华.发明问题解决理论［M］.北京：科学出版社，2004.］

[10] Computer aided innovation system: InventionTool 2.0. Chinese patent of software［Z］.2003SR9983，2003(in Chinese).［计算机辅助创新设计软件系统 InventionTool 2.0, 软件登记号: 2003SR9983.］

[11] GERO J S, SOSA R. Creative design situations［A］. CAADRIA2002［C］. New York,NY,USA: Prentice Hall, 2002.191-198.

[12] GERO J S. Constructive memory in design thinking［A］.Design Thinking Research Symposium: Design Representation［C］.Cambridge,MA,USA:MIT,1999.29-35.

[13] GERO J S. Concept formation in design: towards a loosely wired brain model［A］.Strategic Knowledge and Concept Formation Workshop L［C］.Loughborough,U.K.:Loughborough University of Technology, 1997.135-146.

[14] RICATDO S, GERO J S. Computational models of creative situations［A］. Agents in Design 2002 Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition［C］. Sydney,New South Wales,Australia:University of Sydney, 2002.165-180.

[15] GERO J S. Design tools as situated agents that adapt to their use［A］.eCAADe21, eCAADe［C］. Graz,Austria:Graz University of Technology, 2003.177-180.

[16] KULINSKI J, GERO J S. Constructive representation in situated analogy in design［A］.CAADFutures 2001［C］. Kluwer, Dordrecht,Holland,2001.507-520.

[17] SUWA M, GERO J S, PURCLL T. Unexpected discoveries and s-inventions of design requirements［J］. Design Studies, 2000, 21(6): 539-567.

[18] DENG Jiati, HAN Xiaojian, ZENG Xiao. Product conceptual design［M］. Beijing:China Machine Press, 2002(in Chinese).［邓家褆，韩晓建，曾硝，产品概念设计［M］.北京:机械工业出版社，2002.］

[19] PAHL G, BEITZ W. Engineering design-a systematic approach 2nd Edition［M］. London,U.K.:Springer, 1996.

[20] HURST K. Engineering design principles［M］. London,U.K.:John Wiley & Sons, 1999.

[21] CROSS N. Engineering design methods 3rd Edition［M］. Chichester,U.K.:John Wiley & Sons, 2000.

[22] DOMINICK P G. Tools and tactics of design［M］. New York,NY,USA:John Wiley & Sons, 2001.

[1]	王琦,闻立杰,邓雅方,钱忱,王建民. 基于过程模型约束的轨迹乱序事件修复方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(9): 2491-2500.
[2]	倪维健,吉桂芳,曾庆田,刘彤,段华. 基于表示学习的业务过程模型匹配方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(9): 2661-2669.
[3]	朱锐,黄月,李彤,马自飞,郑明,汤雅惠. 支持结构与行为融合的过程模型索引构建与检索[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(5): 1447-1458.
[4]	王华清,夏鑫,闻立杰,邱泓钧,王建民. 基于结构关系的过程模型推荐方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2020, 26(6): 1445-1455.
[5]	韩咚,田银花,杜玉越,张琴. 基于Petri网可达图的业务对齐方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2020, 26(6): 1589-1606.
[6]	李鹏飞,鲁法明,包云霞,曾庆田,朱冠烨. 基于医疗过程挖掘与患者体征的药物推荐方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2020, 26(6): 1668-1678.
[7]	田银花,杜玉越,韩咚,刘伟. 基于Petri网的事件日志与过程模型对齐方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2019, 25(第4): 809-829.
[8]	滕苑秀,杜玉越,王路. 循环并发结构的过程模型修正方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2019, 25(第4): 882-893.
[9]	朱锐,张志幸,莫启,李彤,马自飞,黎彬. 支持复杂结构的混成过程挖掘方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2018, 24(第7): 1653-1670.
[10]	张鹏,张建辉,董娅凡,张换高,檀润华. #br# 基于附加效应的设计过程复杂性分析过程模型[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2018, 24(第2): 444-454.
[11]	袁琳,刘玉生. 基于SysML的概念设计功能建模方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2018, 24(第1): 164-177.
[12]	李玉良,林培何. 复杂产品的并行变更传播模型研究[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2017, 23(第4期): 737-743.
[13]	李少波,吴正,杨观赐,胡杰,于丽娅. 基于类比设计的专利知识挖掘算法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2017, 23(第11): 2344-2352.
[14]	宫琳,张子健,谢剑,阎艳. 融合设计过程与设计知识的产品概念设计方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2016, 22(第3期): 597-610.
[15]	王佳秋,于浩,王忠杰. 基于融合上下文的移动用户行为过程挖掘与预测[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2016, 22(第2期): 302-311.