产品总体设计方案评价与优选的组合决策

• 论文 •

产品总体设计方案评价与优选的组合决策

杨明顺，李言，林志航

1.西安理工大学机械与精密仪器工程学院，陕西西安 710048;2.西安交通大学 CIM研究所机械制造系统国家重点实验室，陕西西安 710049

收稿日期:2005-01-12 修回日期:2005-09-26 出版日期:2006-04-15 发布日期:2006-04-25
基金资助:
西安理工大学博士启动基金资助项目（220410）。

Combinatorial decision-making on product outline schemes evaluation & optimum selection

YANG Ming-shun, LI Yan, LIN Zhi-hang

1.Sch. of Mechanical & Instrumental Eng., Xi’an Univ. of Tech., Xian 710048, China; 2.State Key Lab of Manufacturing System, CIM Inst., Xian Jiaotong Univ., Xian 710049, China

Received:2005-01-12 Revised:2005-09-26 Online:2006-04-15 Published:2006-04-25
Supported by:
Project supported by the Xian University of Technology Initial Foundation for the Phds,China(No.220410).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了使决策者在产品总体设计方案评价与优选过程中可以充分表达各种主观决策信息，提出了一种基于模糊优选和证据推理的组合决策模型。在该决策模型中，针对评价中的完全决策信息，尽可能地利用模糊优选中的属性相对优属度进行处理；针对定性评价中不确定和不完全决策信息，采用分布式评价的方式进行决策意见表达，然后用基于证据的推理方式进行处理。在此基础上，利用模糊优选中的决策相对优属度进行方案优选。最后给出了实例。

关键词: 产品总体方案, 组合决策, 模糊优选, 证据推理

Abstract: To help the decision makers fully express various subjective decision assessments in the process of product outline schemes evaluation and optimum selection, a combinatorial decision-making model based on fuzzy optimization and evidence reasoning was proposed. In this model, the relative membership degrees of attributes were used to deal with the decision attributes which could be expressed completely; the distributed assessments were used to express the uncertain and incomplete information and the evidence reasoning was used to deal with the information; then the relative membership degrees of decisions were used to select the optimum scheme. Finally case study was presented.

Key words: product outline schemes, combinatorial decision-making, fuzzy optimization, evidence reasoning

中图分类号:

TH122
TP391

杨明顺，李言，林志航. 产品总体设计方案评价与优选的组合决策[J]. .

YANG Ming-shun, LI Yan, LIN Zhi-hang. Combinatorial decision-making on product outline schemes evaluation & optimum selection[J]. .

参考文献

［1］ HAN Xiaojian,DENG Jiati. Evaluation method for projects of product conceptual design［J］. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2000,26(2):210-212(in Chinese).［韩晓建,邓家褆.产品概念设计的方案评价方法［J］.北京航空航天大学学报,2000,26(2)：210-212.］

[2] CHEN C H. Development of a product design evaluation system［M］.MO,USA:University of Missouri-Columbia,1996. 100-120.

[3] YANG Mingshun,LIN Zhihang. Evaluation and selection of conceptual design schemes supported by multi-tool integration［J］.Mini-Micro Systems,2003,24(6):1037-1041(in Chinese).［杨明顺,林志航.多工具集成支持的产品概念设计方案评价与决策［J］.小型微型计算机系统,2003,24(6)：1037-1041.］

[4] OZER M. A survey of new product evaluation［J］.Journal of Innovation Management,1999,16(1):77-94.

[5] SEN P. Multiple criteria decision making in design selection and synthesis［J］.Journal of Engineering,1995,6(1):207-230.

[6] YANG J B,SEN P. Multiple attribute design evaluation of complex engineering product using the evidential reasoning approach［J］.Journal of Engineering Design,1997,8(3):211-230.

[7] GRECO S,MATARAZZO B,SLOWINSKI R，et al. Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis［J］.European Journal of Operational Research,2001,129(1):1-47.

[8] GREEN G. Towards integrated design evaluation:validation of models［J］. Journal of Engineering Design,2000,11(2):1221-132.

[9] KING A M,SIVALOGANATHAN S. Development of a methodology for concept selection in flexible design strategies［J］.Journal of Engineering Design,1999,10(4):329-349.

[10] LI Hongxing,WANG Peizhuang. Fuzzy mathematics［M］.Beijing:National Defence Industry Press,1994. 50-60(in Chinese).［李洪兴,汪培庄.模糊数学［M］.北京：国防工业出版社,1994.50-60.］

[11] CHEN Shouyu. Engineering fuzzy set theory and application［M］.Dalian:Dalian University of Technology Press,1994.40-50(in Chinese).［陈守煜.工程模糊集理论与应用［M］.大连：大连理工大学出版社,1994.40-50.］

[12] FAN Pengfei,LIU Yong. Application of fuzzy selection method in selection of talent［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science,1998,6(1):48-52(in Chinese).［范鹏飞,刘勇.模糊优选法在人才选拔中的应用［J］.中国管理科学,1998,6(1)：48-52.］

[13] BEYNON M. The D-S theory of evidence:an alternative approach to multicriteria decision modeling［J］.Omega,2000,28(1):37-50.

[14] LUO Shifei. Research on key techniques of axiomatic design based scheme generation and the tool realization［D］. Xi’an:Xi’an Jiaotong University,2003(in Chinese).［罗时飞.公理化设计支持的概念设计中方案生成关键技术研究与工具实现［D］.西安:西安交通大学,2003.］

[1]	李海龙,陈发源,计效园,李建斌,周建新. 基于改进SPEA2算法的铸造并行车间主生产计划[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2021, 27(4): 1072-1080.
[2]	安相华,牛春亮,薛冬娟,慕光宇,林晓华. 基于变粒度权重与群决策的产品服务系统方案优选方法[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2016, 22(第1期): 155-165.
[3]	聂文滨,刘卫东,汪建东,曾天,胡坤. 基于证据理论和矩阵相似度的工艺失效风险评估[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2016, 22(第11期): 2602-2612.
[4]	付超,肖明,孙超平. 考虑公平权重的云服务供应商选择[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2015, 21(第8期): 2240-2248.
[5]	郑永前，喻赛君. 基于可重生PSO的双层产品组合决策问题[J]. , 2013, 19 (04 ): 0-0.
[6]	安相华，刘振宇，谭建荣，张秀芬. QFD中质量特性实现水平的多目标协同确定方法[J]. , 2010, 16(06): 0-0.
[7]	张丽君，黄德才+，刘端阳, 龚卫华, 朱凌. 基于证据推理的网格服务质量量化与调度算法[J]. , 2008, 14(04): 0-0.
[8]	褚学宁，张在房，刘航. 供应商参与的水平定向钻机整机设计方案决策研究[J]. , 2007, 13(06): 0-0.
[9]	张杰，李原，张开富，杨海成. 项目管理中进度调整的模糊动态规划方法[J]. , 2006, 12(08): 0-0.